CONNECT ON:
Shamim Zakaria
  • Home
  • ABOUT
  • PORTFOLIO
  • Contact

A FLAWED SECURITY BILL: How the Food Security Bill is barely a solution for the indigent population, causing the economy to tremble further.

5/9/2013

2 Comments

 
PictureImage courtesy- indiawaterportal.org
It’s a stereotyped mindset that speaking about poverty, malnutrition and hunger, the effigy of the African countries and people residing over there comes at the first place. Speaking about India, even though we claim ourselves being on the path of development and it’s a pretension by our politicians from varied parties that poverty is on the verge of extinction and very soon it’s likely to be eradicated. However, despite calling ourselves as a self sufficient and a country devoid of hunger, studies suggests that the condition of India is far worse that the African countries interms of poverty. According to the World Bank, the rate of underweight children in India is highest among all other countries and is double than that of Sub-Saharan Africa.

Keeping this scenario in mind the UPA-II’s Food Security Bill, finally got a green signal in the Parliament, first by the Lok Sabha on August 26th and then after a 10 hour long debate on 2nd September by the Rajya Sabha. Certainly, any concerned and responsible citizen who really wants the problems of starving Indians to be extirpated would never argue against it, however an abyss study of the bill would perhaps intrigue one to think that the bill is certainly a sole political interest by the UPA government and it would barely solve any problems of the countries indigent population. However, implementing it would in a way increase the country’s economic woes, further causing it to tremble.

Firstly, all are well aware that 2014 is knocking at the door i.e. time for the Lok Sabha Polls is nearing. This perhaps gives a reason to think, why only at this point of time the government became voracious for the bill and implementing it. When the government first, laid the bill in the Lok Sabha, the opposition disagreed to certain provisions and wanted its amendment. The government at once made up its mind for the amendments and agreed to all the demands of the opposition, without and discontentment that was hale enough. This is a clear indicative towards the government’s hastiness to secure its vote and states that the bill is not any measure for securing the country’s future. So, perhaps calling it a vote security bill won’t make any difference.

A thorough study of the Food Security Bill, shew that in the entire draft of 16 pages, only the initial 1-2 pages speaks about the provisions of the bill, whereas the entire bill is flooded with strategies about on how it will function. A point in the bill says there will be reformation of the PDS and a grievance redressal system would be formed and under it there will be provision for registering complains via internet, call centers, help lines and in the form of letters to the district and state forums. Now, the fact is the food security bill is intrigued towards the poverty stricken ones, so how can a person living in the state of hunger and leading a inhuman life can use the internet or the telephonic medium to complain about his/her pang. It’s the person’s affliction that matters to him and the knee wrenching process of complains doesn’t bother him in any way. As result his poverty and starvation will continue, the food security bill thus failing to make any sort of impact. This clearly suggests that, the grievance redressal system is an absolute flawed one. And one can’t certainly argue that, there won’t be any sort of irregularities while implementing the promises in the bill, as under the tenure of UPA and congress, corruption is a regular course of action, somewhat similar to a staple food!!

Speaking on the context of the country’s economy, even the Prime Minister this time was bound to open his mouth, agreeing to the fact that India’s economic scenario is facing a tough time. Though the government says that, the bill will add up only 25,000 crore to the existing amount spent on country’s food security, however as per the calculations of some economists implementation of the bill would add up to Rs. 2,00,000 crore towards the country’s existing amount spent for food security, and not 25,000 crore. This will further add up to the country’s economic woes. How, just after passing of the bill the rupee has gone further down, is a clearly indication of how the bill might trigger the economy to tremble further in the days to come.

Lastly, studies suggest that, the country lacks in an ample storage facility, and which might cause the stored food purchased under the Food Security Bill, to decay, that ought to create an artificial food scarcity in the country.

The introspected facts, in a crystal clear manner discloses the government’s motives as taking shield of the bill and the poverty stricken Indians, the UPA is simply playing vote politics and securing its future for the 2014 polls.
              
                  
No unauthorized publication or use of any content allowed without prior permission | All rights reserved by the author | Feel free to Share via buttons displayed on the left side

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
2 Comments
Junaid Hussain Khan
5/9/2013 05:25:29 am

Great Work Shamim Bhai !!!
U Made My Concepts clear regarding this bill..
Thanks & Good Luck !

Reply
Abdul link
5/9/2013 09:08:09 pm

The FSB bill will alternatively reduce the cost. I will refer the example given by development economist Jean Dreaze "Upgrading a Rs. 50000 computer to Rs. 55000 does not mean that it cost Rs. 55000 but actually it costs only Rs. 5000/-. At the same time if Rs. 50000 computing is lying idle because is not workable due to lacking upgadition definitely thrusts to upgrade and also additional Rs. 5000 enables the Rs. 55000 to work properly.

Currently, the food grain procured under MSP is rotting in the warehouses, through FBS these will reach the beneficiaries.

Finally, I would say where more than 50% children malnourished, FSB is a right step as a social investment. And politics? If politics bring something good why should we oppose? But should take necessary steps for proper functioning

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    July 2018
    February 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    September 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012

    Shamim Zakaria

    Promote your Page too
    Subscribe to Newsletter

    PAGE VIEWS

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.